Casually Vacant
©2012
by LeeZard
“twad-dle – Noun – Trivial or
foolish speech or writing; nonsense.”
The
joke is on us and J.K. Rowling is laughing all the way to the bank.
The
billionaire creator of Harry Potter published her first book for adults earlier
this year, “The Casual Vacancy,” and watched it rack up 125,000 sales in its
first week of release in the United Kingdom. That was second only to Dan
Brown’s “The Lost Symbol” which sold half-a-million copies its first week.
While sales after that slowed, Ms. Rowling’s book still found its way to many
bestseller lists on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. My question is, “Why?”
LeeZard
is a huge Harry Potter fan; read all the books – some of them twice – and saw
all the films. Loved ‘em! When Rowling’s new book was announced I rushed to my
library’s website to place a “hold” only to be disappointed by my place in
line, 388. “Well worth waiting for,” I told myself even though the publisher’s
preview blurb didn’t scream excitement and page-turning drama; in fact, it
screamed business as usual:
When Barry Fairbrother dies
in his early forties, the town of Pagford is left in shock.
Pagford is,
seemingly, an English idyll, with a cobbled market square and an ancient abbey,
but what lies behind the pretty façade is a town at war.
Rich at war with
poor, teenagers at war with their parents, wives at war with their husbands,
teachers at war with their pupils…Pagford is not what it first seems.
And the
empty seat left by Barry on the parish council soon becomes the catalyst for
the biggest war the town has yet seen. Who will triumph in an election fraught
with passion, duplicity and unexpected revelations?
I
finally got the notice this week and rushed to my local branch to get my hands
on what would surely become a new LeeZard favorite. Sixty-eight pages into it,
I closed “The Casual Vacancy” forever, with a big yawn. If it wasn’t by J.K.
Rowling, I doubt I would’ve gotten that far.
No
less a publication than the New York
Times agrees with LeeZard:
“Unfortunately, the real-life world
she has limned in these pages is so willfully banal, so depressingly clichéd
that “The Casual Vacancy” is not only disappointing — it’s dull.”
Couldn’t
have said it better myself!
Here’s
my theory then: LeeZard cannot believe J.K. Rowling would knowingly write such
TWADDLE (love that word!) unless she had a reason and the reason, my friends,
is the joke.
Let’s
face it, kids; J.K. Rowling does not need the money. So I’m thinking she
decided on a little social experiment.
“Let’s see,” she tells her agent, “if I can write something totally
inane, won’t it be funny to watch people snap it up just because my name is on it?”
Comments